Itay specializes in counseling and representing corporations and individuals in complex civil-commercial litigation.
When counseling private and business clients, Itay provides advice to plaintiffs and defendants on choice of legal strategy, as well as creative and practical solutions that are tailored for each client.
Itay specializes in handling disputes encompassing a wide range of legal disciplines including contract disputes, disputes among shareholders, real-estate disputes, disputes over infringement of copyrights and trademarks, insolvency proceedings, class actions, derivative suits, securities law, brokerage law, administrative petitions, petitions to the High Court of Justice, etc.
Tel Aviv University (LL.B), 2010
Member of Israel Bar Association since 2011
News and updates - Itay Hatam:
Purchase Group United Sarona about to Fall Apart
The purchase group United Sarona, which won a tender a year and a half ago to build several towers near Sarona Market in Tel Aviv, is about to fall apart. In the last few days, several members of the group have begun organizing, through Adv. Zohar Lande, Head of the Litigation Department at Barnea & Co., to file a lawsuit against United Sarona's organizers, after they failed to recruit new members or find alternative funding sources to ensure the progress of the project.
Espresso Club Files an Appeal to Increase the Court Expenses to the Sum of Half a Million Shekels
After the rejection of the Nespresso and Nestle case against Espresso Club in which they alleged copyright infringement, Espresso Club, represented by Adv. Zohar Lande and Itay Hatam from the Litigation Department at Barnea & Co. filed an appeal regarding the amount of expenses determined by the District Court, claiming that the amount is unreasonable in relation to the actual expenses.
Nespresso Loses Court Battle with Espresso Club
The Israeli District Court of Tel Aviv ruled against global food giant, Nestle, and its subsidiary Nespresso in a claim filed by them in Israel against Espresso Club, an Israeli company, on the grounds of alleged copyright infringement, trademark violations, unfair competition and damage to Nespresso's reputation.