Noa represents Israeli and foreign corporations in a wide variety of complex disputes.
Noa has a particular expertise with respect to commercial and corporate litigation and arbitration, defence of class action litigation, securities litigation, insolvency litigation, civil disputes and administrative proceedings.
Noa joined Barnea & Co. in 2007 and became a partner in 2012. Noa has had over 10 years’ experience.
Noa holds a bachelor’s degree in law & Business Administration from the Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya, Israel.
Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya, LL.B, B.A, 2003
Member of Israel Bar Association since 2004
News and updates - Noa Havdala:
Insolvency in a Nutshell
Insolvency proceedings are an integral part of business-commercial activities, in circumstances whereby a person or corporation might need to institute proceedings to rehabilitate its business activities or even to liquidate the company.
Insolvency reflects a factual situation in which a debtor (person or corporation) encounters economic and cash flow difficulties to the extent that the debtor is incapable of paying its debts to creditors on time.
Insolvency proceedings seek to implement a fair and proper distribution of the remaining resources of the debtor (person or corporation) among the various creditors; during insolvency proceedings, the court considers the creditors’ different interests, including maximizing the disposition of the debtor’s resources; ensuring proper employment of the business’ employees; minimizing the burden on the public taxpayers; taking care of the business’ customers; taking care of suppliers that are dependent upon the business (particularly in the instance of rehabilitation and recovery); and providing assistance to shareholders in small and medium-sized businesses.
During insolvency proceedings, a differentiation is made between debtors who are private individuals and debtors that are corporations (including companies). When at issue is a private individual, the court considers critical issues, such as whether lawsuits have been filed against the debtor (including execution proceedings) and whether additional debts exist beyond the debts that are the subject of the legal proceedings.
Thus for example: in the instance whereby a number of execution proceedings have been filed against a debtor, the debtor may arrive at an arrangement whereby the cases are consolidated and his debt repayments are scheduled in installments but, naturally, the debt scheduling does not take into account any debts not covered by the execution proceedings.
Therefore, when at issue is a debtor who is a private individual desiring to arrange all of his debts, he must conduct negotiations with his creditors and, subsequently, he must file a motion with the court petitioning for approval of a compromise or settlement proposal with his creditors according to the provisions prescribed in the Bankruptcy Ordinance [New Version], 5740 – 1980.
When at issue is a company that is facing insolvency due to economic and cash flow difficulties, it has two options:
- Stay of proceedings pending the filing disposition of a motion and rehabilitation proceedings
A company that faces insolvency may petition the court to enable it to institute rehabilitation and recovery proceedings by way of preparing a recovery plan and debt rescheduling (in the manner prescribed in section 350 of the Companies Law, 5759 – 1999).
A motion for business rehabilitation also depends upon a motion for a stay of proceedings, the purpose of which is to prevent creditors from filing lawsuits against the company and to freeze any legal proceeding filed against the company until the motion filing date, which gives the company time to implement its rehabilitation plan. The court will issue a stay of proceedings order only if it is convinced that there is a reasonable chance that implementing the rehabilitation plan will lead to the financial recovery of the company; a stay of proceedings order is usually limited to a timeframe ranging between a few weeks and nine months.
The court also has the power to appoint a trustee or special administrator to oversee the implementation of the company’s recovery plan during the period of the stay of proceedings. The trustee’s powers are defined by the court, depending upon the circumstances that led to the company’s insolvency .Such powers often include management of the company during the period of the stay of proceedings, the waiving of onerous contracts, if necessary, and the conducting of an investigation of the circumstances that led to the company’s insolvency.
- Liquidation of the company
There are instances whereby a company is facing insolvency, but any rehabilitation or recovery plan would be fruitless, or, alternatively, if there is no longer any economic justification for continuing its operation.
In instances whereby at issue is an insolvent company for which there is no justification or plausible way to lead to its recovery, interested parties, including creditors and shareholders, may file motions for liquidation proceedings against the company.
A liquidation proceeding is a legal proceeding that basically dissolves the existence of the legal entity of the company, first, by emptying the company of all of its economic content, and later, dissolving its existence as a legal entity.
The Companies Law recognizes three types of liquidation proceedings: voluntary liquidation, voluntary liquidation under court supervision and compulsory liquidation by the court.
Any funds obtained as a result of the disposal of the company’s assets will first be used to repay the company’s debts to its creditors according to the disposition rules prescribed by law (e.g the rights of secured creditors), and according to lawsuits filed by creditors. Insofar as any money remains after all creditors have been repaid, the surplus is distributed among the shareholders and equity investors of the company.
Class Action against Capital Trade and the owner, Kobi Lutzki
A class action suit in the amount of NIS 15 million was filed against Capital Trade and its owner, Kobi Lutzki, on the grounds of managing investment portfolios without a license and collecting of commissions and management fees from the clients unlawfully. Adv. Noa Havdala and Adv. Moran Bickel from the Litigation Department at Barnea & Co. who are representing the company and its owner, were interviewed by Globes and claimed that Capital Trade acted lawfully, in accordance with the prevailing regulations.
The Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya Alumni Association
Adv. Noa Havdala and Adv. Ron Nitzan from Barnea & Co. will take part today in "The Lawyers of Tomorrow" project, held in cooperation with the Alumni Association, Career Center and Student Union of the Interdisciplinary Center.